![header=[Marker Text] body=[Pittsburgh industrialist and philanthropist, Frick was instrumental in the organization of the coke and steel industries. His controversial management style while chairman of Carnegie Steel led to the bloody Homestead Strike, 1892.] sign](kora/files/1/10/1-A-2C6-139-ExplorePAHistory-a0k3i1-a_450.jpg)
Mouse over for marker text
Name:
Henry Clay Frick [Bituminous Coal]
Region:
Pittsburgh Region
County:
Allegheny
Marker Location:
437 Grant St., Frick Bldg., Pittsburgh
Dedication Date:
December 10, 1946
Behind the Marker
Henry Clay Frick dominated the
coke industry during the late nineteenth century, first as head of his own company, and then as a partner with
Andrew Carnegie. [He and Carnegie also integrated coke and steel production. His dominance of the coke industry contrasted with the fragmented ownership of bituminous coal mines in western Pennsylvania and more closely resembled the oligarchic control that a handful of railroads exercised over anthracite mining in eastern Pennsylvania (see the
Danville-Pottsville Railroad marker essay in the Anthracite story).
Coke manufacture in southwestern Pennsylvania was divided among numerous, small operations in 1870. Frick soon transformed the coke industry and his fortunes. About 1870, while working in his grandfather's store in Westmoreland County, young Frick remarked, "I see no reason why I should not become a millionaire during my lifetime." He observed that iron furnaces needed coke produced from local coal, and he determined to make his fortune in the coke industry. He, two relatives, and a friend formed a company in 1871 to produce coke for iron foundries and blast furnaces. The firm started small, purchasing 123 acres of coal land and fifty ovens in Fayette County.
By 1873 the firm, renamed Frick and Company, operated 200 beehive
coke ovens or about five percent of the total ovens in the Pittsburgh coal seam (see
First Mining of Pittsburgh Coal. Then the 1873 Panic hit, depressing coke sales greatly and threatening to put Frick and Company out of business. Astute and determined, Frick pursued customers for his coke unceasingly.
In 1876, as demand for coke began to recover from the economic depression, Frick starting buying up coke ovens, and in 1879 purchased coal land in Morewood, Westmoreland County to build another 500 ovens. By his thirtieth birthday in 1879, he reached his goal of becoming a millionaire. Continuing his acquisitions, in 1883 he reached another milestone, ownership of more than one third of the coke ovens in the Connellsville district of the Pittsburgh seam. He owned far more than his nearest competitor, and had established himself as "The Coke King."
Frick's growing dominance of the coke industry made him an attractive partner for Andrew Carnegie, who led the enormous expansion of the iron and steel industry in the Pittsburgh region. In 1881 Frick was already selling more of his coke to Carnegie's iron furnaces than to any other customer. Carnegie decided, "We must attach this young man Frick to our concern. He has great ability and great energy. Moreover, he has the coke-and we need it."
In 1882 Carnegie and his associates bought shares of the newly formed H.C. Frick Coke Company, and by autumn 1883 they owned a majority share. This partnership benefited Frick and the Carnegie associates in several ways. The Carnegies obtained coke at a lower price than they could from other suppliers, reducing their steel production costs and raising profits.
They also gained Frick's astute managerial abilities and determination. Frick rose to the top management of the Carnegie Steel Company, serving as president or chairman from 1889 to 1900. Frick gained capital with which he continued purchasing coal lands and coke ovens in the Pittsburgh seam. By 1900 H. C. Frick Coke Company controlled nearly 15,000 coke ovens, or about half of the coke ovens in southwestern Pennsylvania.
But Frick's partnership with Carnegie was a double-edged sword. When Frick became a minority owner, Carnegie became the key decision maker in H.C. Frick Coke Company. Conflict between Frick and Carnegie grew over time. Frick, who disdained workers in his drive for profits and expansion, bluntly refused to allow a pay raise during an 1887 strike by coke workers. Carnegie and his associates, who wanted a continuous supply of coke for their iron and steel mills, overruled Frick and forced him to grant the raise, a decision that Frick always resented.
Frick gained notoriety during the 1891
Morewood Massacre in which his deputies fired on striking coke workers, killing seven. Relations between Frick and Carnegie deteriorated further during the 1892
Homestead strike in which Frick fomented a deadly battle with striking steel workers. Finally, Carnegie expelled Frick from the steel company in 1900.
Frick's dominance of the coke industry contrasted sharply with the diffuse ownership of bituminous mines. During the late nineteenth and early twentieth century, coal-mining companies varied in size from small "country bank" mines to huge firms; however, most coal companies were small and locally owned.
In 1919, 1,348 companies employed on average thirteen workers and mined less than 25,000 tons annually. At the other end of the scale, twenty firms averaged 2,400 workers and each extracted over one million tons annually. But not even the largest firms dominated the bituminous coal industry. An observer of the industry wrote in 1925 that operators were "a heterogeneous, unorganized, infinitely diverse, and hotly competing aggregate."
Entrepreneurs found it fairly easy to enter coal mining. They had a ready supply of coal spread across an area almost twice the size of New Jersey, and they needed a small amount of capital to open a mine. Large firms were unable to keep new operators from entering the fields, and they could not drive out the many existing, small and medium-size companies. Firms' sporadic efforts to voluntarily limit production and fix prices mostly failed.


Coke manufacture in southwestern Pennsylvania was divided among numerous, small operations in 1870. Frick soon transformed the coke industry and his fortunes. About 1870, while working in his grandfather's store in Westmoreland County, young Frick remarked, "I see no reason why I should not become a millionaire during my lifetime." He observed that iron furnaces needed coke produced from local coal, and he determined to make his fortune in the coke industry. He, two relatives, and a friend formed a company in 1871 to produce coke for iron foundries and blast furnaces. The firm started small, purchasing 123 acres of coal land and fifty ovens in Fayette County.
By 1873 the firm, renamed Frick and Company, operated 200 beehive


In 1876, as demand for coke began to recover from the economic depression, Frick starting buying up coke ovens, and in 1879 purchased coal land in Morewood, Westmoreland County to build another 500 ovens. By his thirtieth birthday in 1879, he reached his goal of becoming a millionaire. Continuing his acquisitions, in 1883 he reached another milestone, ownership of more than one third of the coke ovens in the Connellsville district of the Pittsburgh seam. He owned far more than his nearest competitor, and had established himself as "The Coke King."
Frick's growing dominance of the coke industry made him an attractive partner for Andrew Carnegie, who led the enormous expansion of the iron and steel industry in the Pittsburgh region. In 1881 Frick was already selling more of his coke to Carnegie's iron furnaces than to any other customer. Carnegie decided, "We must attach this young man Frick to our concern. He has great ability and great energy. Moreover, he has the coke-and we need it."
In 1882 Carnegie and his associates bought shares of the newly formed H.C. Frick Coke Company, and by autumn 1883 they owned a majority share. This partnership benefited Frick and the Carnegie associates in several ways. The Carnegies obtained coke at a lower price than they could from other suppliers, reducing their steel production costs and raising profits.
They also gained Frick's astute managerial abilities and determination. Frick rose to the top management of the Carnegie Steel Company, serving as president or chairman from 1889 to 1900. Frick gained capital with which he continued purchasing coal lands and coke ovens in the Pittsburgh seam. By 1900 H. C. Frick Coke Company controlled nearly 15,000 coke ovens, or about half of the coke ovens in southwestern Pennsylvania.
But Frick's partnership with Carnegie was a double-edged sword. When Frick became a minority owner, Carnegie became the key decision maker in H.C. Frick Coke Company. Conflict between Frick and Carnegie grew over time. Frick, who disdained workers in his drive for profits and expansion, bluntly refused to allow a pay raise during an 1887 strike by coke workers. Carnegie and his associates, who wanted a continuous supply of coke for their iron and steel mills, overruled Frick and forced him to grant the raise, a decision that Frick always resented.
Frick gained notoriety during the 1891


Frick's dominance of the coke industry contrasted sharply with the diffuse ownership of bituminous mines. During the late nineteenth and early twentieth century, coal-mining companies varied in size from small "country bank" mines to huge firms; however, most coal companies were small and locally owned.
In 1919, 1,348 companies employed on average thirteen workers and mined less than 25,000 tons annually. At the other end of the scale, twenty firms averaged 2,400 workers and each extracted over one million tons annually. But not even the largest firms dominated the bituminous coal industry. An observer of the industry wrote in 1925 that operators were "a heterogeneous, unorganized, infinitely diverse, and hotly competing aggregate."
Entrepreneurs found it fairly easy to enter coal mining. They had a ready supply of coal spread across an area almost twice the size of New Jersey, and they needed a small amount of capital to open a mine. Large firms were unable to keep new operators from entering the fields, and they could not drive out the many existing, small and medium-size companies. Firms' sporadic efforts to voluntarily limit production and fix prices mostly failed.
Beyond the Marker